A4 — Monitoring and evaluation
Model Lyceum (practice school) · Digital Development Plan
Now: 1 — Accidental · Target: 3 — Process redesign · Advance
What reaching this level asks of the school
These requirements come from the instrument’s progression model and are general on purpose. How this school meets them is what the initiatives below describe.
level 3 — Process redesign
Data shared with the school community (with data-protection compliance); leadership analyses thoroughly, results feed self-evaluation.
What level 1 asked, for comparison
Data collected only as much/rarely as required by the state; analysed only for formal reporting, with no resulting decisions or plan changes.
What this parameter aims at
Initiatives
What the school will actually do. A parameter can carry as many initiatives as it needs; each one names who does it, who oversees it, when, and how success is measured.
Monthly peer observation of lessons
KPIs and targets
| Measure | Target for success | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Lessons observed | 40 in the year |
Correct — Lessons observed |
| Teachers observed at least once | All teachers |
Correct — Teachers observed at least once |
Termly review of the monitoring data
KPIs and targets
| Measure | Target for success | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews held and minuted | 2 |
Correct — Reviews held and minuted |